The total BULLSHIT about left and wing collaboration government

Coalition government - a term which keep popping out during Malaysian and some citizens from the European Union daily activity. After reading the Cameroon biography my thoughts on any coalition government between right and left become more despised. Maybe we can compare both UK and Malaysia coalition government and see what the similarities and disparities is. 

 

There are three important aspects when we want to discuss conservatism. These aspects are personal freedom, community traditions and the role of government. During Cameroon period, the major erosion on personal freedom were GAY MARRIAGE. Most people believe that GAY MARRIAGE is a sign of support personal freedom, then government should legalize it. The first part of the above statement is true but the part about the government was terribly wrong. Allowing the hand of government to enter personal freedom actually is a sign of government expansion. Why should the state hold the power to recognize the people's lifestyle? Left wing politicians like to say "let people live their life" but ended up with the government enforcing the law to "recognize" people's personal life. What an irony. 

 

Second will be community traditions, for hundreds of years British are built up under the influence of Christianity. Therefore, marriage means a sacred union between a man and a woman. However, under the attack from Marxist warrior, now British are starting to dismantle this sacred union, and Cameroon push for GAY MARRIAGE should let us consider he should not be a self-proclaimed conservative figure. GAY MARRIAGE should be considered as ultimate personal freedom therefore state should not involve. In the meantime, the GAY MARRIAGE also should not be allowed to adopt any children, because this will deprive the children of having a real mother. Below are the link that he support such action to destroy the family:

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/david-cameron-on-the-first-uk-same-sex-marriages 

 

A trojan horse in UK?

 Thirdly would be the role of government. Conservatives believe in small government but based on what Cameroon biography says I feel he doesn't look like a person who believes in this value. He says he believes in “BIG SOCIETY”, but I sense this as a trick to cover the intention that his real motive is trying to make the government become bigger and bigger. No doubt the best way to expand the government role would be to increase social welfare and most of the time social welfare consumes more money and energy when compared to defense spending.

 

Most importantly, state social welfare more often brings harm to people. The reason was obvious and simple because people misuse the system. In the past decade we often can see some UK local newspapers reporting Muslim Migrants sucking on the UK welfare system. They come to the UK with a huge family but refuse to work and ask for free cash, a free house and free food. Those situations have not stopped and have continued to happen until now. No doubt a collaboration government between left and right showcase how the right lose their value.

 

 

 Then, lets us look at Malaysia. In Malaysia we don’t have any political party which advocate on small government and support on personal freedom. I think 99% of political party in Malaysia are favor on big federal government. Then in Malaysia when we hear about conservative that mean protect Malay Special Right, enhance federal power to enforce Malay superiority doctrine. The former prime minister tries to reduce the sense of race class, so he introduces the idea of T20, M40 and B40. However, he loses the General Election in 2018 and now serve his sentence on corruption case. Then during 2018, Dr Mahathir decided to cooperate which he enemy DAP which shock the Malaysian and mark the starting of losing its value on both sides.

 

DAP is supporting on Malaysian for Malaysia, but Dr Mahathir represent the uphold on Malay Special Right. Since the cooperate announce DAP quickly abandon their value and never intended to challenge the Malay Special Right. However, this collaboration only last two years then it collapses. During the period of 2018 until 2020, I think the major winner would be the Malay conservative because they managed to castrate their major enemy in Malaysia politic realm. Before became a part of federal government DAP did advocate on reduce on government size which mean reduce the staff which employ by the federal government or closing some unnecessary department but when their become the members in the federal government, they also throw this idea from the bus.

 

 

Then if you ask me what does UMNO, and other Malay parties lose when their form a collaboration with a political party which never uphold Malay Special Rights. I think the only possible answer should be they will bombard by some Muslim voters?

Maybe we the non-Muslim are the biggest loser during the period from 2018 until now? (1200, 21/6/2023)

欢迎来到新美国社会主义商业模式

 在写这篇文章前我必须告诉大家在我的读书生涯时我没读过任何商业的课程然后毕业工作后也没做过生意就是一个单纯的打工宅。不过最近一家美国啤酒公司的商业策略让我这个门外汉看的目瞪口呆而且在东方社会这个新闻也没人跟进所以我就写下我自己的看法。

首先在还没讨论商业课题前我们先来简单了解美国社会的情况。在经历了半个世纪的努力下共产党人终于找到了如何摧毁美国的办法。这个办法就是先破坏其文化然后以舆论迫使政府进行政策变化接着把政府越做越大，然后再用政府的力量逼迫每个人接受它们的价值观。以前的我从中学开始就一直觉得政治是大过一切可是长大后我觉得这类型想法并没有错只不过要看地方。假如是在半独裁社会和一党专政的国家，的确是政治大过一切。可是在西方民主政治国家文化却是能够反过来影响政治的因为西方政府未必能够全面掌控社会上的声音。能够展示社会舆论影响文化接着影响政治的就是接下来说到的东东。

那么下个月六月份就是所谓的Pride Month。在东方或西方的传统宗教或文化的节日人们通常最多也是庆祝两到三天比如农历新年我们庆祝除夕吃团员饭然后初一到初三拜年然后初四就开工。穆斯林则是先斋戒一个月之后就庆祝过年而且庆祝的日子也是两三天然后就回归普通的生活作息。

为了加强“新文化”的影响力，共产党人学习的纳粹宣传部长曾经说过的一句话那就是谎言被宣传了一千次就能变成真理。为此Pride Month成为了一个长达一个月的宣传活动毕竟假如只是和传统节目一样只是庆祝几天是不够的所以它们要猛烈宣传猛烈的展示自己的不同。接下来在六月份的欧美世界人们会不断看到彩虹旗在每个平台被展现。任何不愿参与这个一个月的活动的人们就会被扣上“恐同”的标签。在这样的“新文化”影响下美国的商业社会也开始走向左派路线，那就是政治正确重要过一切。

那么在梳理完背景故事后我们进入正题，以下的商业故事在美国掀起舆论重点讨论不过在东方世界却鲜少有人报道。Bud Light‘s是一家美国啤酒公司不过后来被欧洲公司给收购，回顾这家公司的广告我们就能一看“新文化”对美国企业的影响：

90年代广告是开变性人玩笑 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bo_K_JBZmXI 

同性恋结婚广告 2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vETmzQcc4A 

至于今年四月份Bud Light’s 和抖阴变性人Dylan Mulvaney 拍摄的广告我觉得大家这个自行在YouTube 搜寻就能找到了。由于我看了都觉得其广告后都觉得恶心所以我不想把它的广告放在我的blog。那么在美国保守派猛烈抨击这个反人类的广告后，Bud Light’s marketing VP Alissa Heinerscheid 一开始还强调这是公司的文化包容政策并要继续下去哪怕这会让原本的顾客不想喝这个啤酒。

单从数字上来说“LGBTQABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ”群体只占了美国总人口不到20%，那么为了讨好这样的群体而牺牲80%的群体这真的是理性的做法吗？

随着公司股票大跌加上Bud Light’s 在一些美国运动球场的门市店面被人杯葛后，结果就是 VP Alissa Heinerscheid 被董事会强制休假并重拍了一部男性味浓厚的广告。可是拍了新的广告后大多数人还是不买账，就当我觉得这个事情应该也会逐渐淡下来之时。美国一个独立记者协会名字叫Project Veritas成功找到了Bud Light’s新的市场销售负责人并和他进行了对话。这一次的对话我只能称为“比神经病还要更加神经病”的市场销售策略，因为它们打算开发不喝酒的穆斯林市场，哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈。

大家可以看这位美国媒体分析人的影片 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhQp3C-xnbI 然后在第2.19分钟你会看到Bud Light’s Head of Marketing诉说自己要开发不喝酒的穆斯林市场。左派的祸害不只是诞生了共产主义这只猛兽蚕食中国，就连美国也开始了共产党式的企业文化。假如你是有注意中国新闻的你就会知道在2019年杭州市派了100名机关干部进驻阿里巴巴以及一些私企这就是共产党准备吞并私企的准备工作。那么美国的共产党好朋友左派又是如何进行它们伟大的工作呢？

美国式的共产主义

首先它们打着大爱并接受一切弱势群体的口号要求大公司增加一个部门其名字为Department of inclusive and diversity，这个部门的工作就是不追求商业上的获利反而是要公司在聘请员工时不以能力标准反而要以性别、种族、家庭来做标准。假如你是一个白人男性已婚有孩子，它们会觉得你是一个已经享受了无数特权的族群所以企业有空位也未必能够给你进来工作。假如你是一个黑人女性、又是同性恋、又想领养孩子，那么你被聘请的几率会高过前面的白人男性因为你是它们眼里的弱势群体。哪怕这位黑人女性并没有对公司贡献的价值可是她还会被聘请接着假如换了领导层当公司要把这些没贡献的人开除公司也要小心翼翼不然等下这些“弱势群体”还会反告公司歧视她们哪怕一开始让她们进来就是因为政治正确。

那么假如下一次你在选购美股时看到有任何公司大张旗鼓地宣传自己也有一个Department of inclusive and diversity时我觉得你还是放空这家公司比较好。希望这一招能够帮助有缘人赚到钱，哈哈哈哈哈哈。

中年男人的单独旅程

 在三月时我拿了六天年假再加上我的四天休息日我一次过直接休息十天。在休息的这十天我首先去了东马美里探望我的朋友然后又去吉隆坡最后回自己在柔佛的老家。我上一次去美里应该是2015年或是2014年，那时是因为工作关系所以去了美里做了一场工作当时美里给我的印象是购物商场满多并不会输古晋太多。

另外美里的住宅区没有像古晋那样只有一个出入口，相反则是和我老家一样。一个住宅区有几个出入口而且一个住宅区还和其他住宅区是相通的，当时让我有点感觉像是回到了老家。唯独食物肯定是和我老家不一样而且当时在美里也没发生什么不愉快的事情所以就希望以后可以再来美里的山洞(Gua Niah)看看。

由于新加坡直飞美里的班机不是每天有所以我就选择先飞古晋然后再飞美里。为此当我抵达美里飞机场时已经是下午了然后我去酒店休息并准备晚上和朋友吃晚餐。到了晚上时间我朋友驱车来载我去吃晚餐，吃完晚餐后他就载着我在美里市区游车河一轮并告诉我一些地方可以等隔一天天亮时来走走看看。在这段游车河的时候不少地方的确是勾起我曾经的回忆，当年在美里工作时也是常在放工后晚上在美里市区驾车走走看看。不过当年我来时有些地方的灯没有现在的那么多所以有些地方带给我的感觉就是似曾相识可是却又不是很有印象。

后来就来到一个地方叫美里时代广场，我不仅觉得不对劲而且心里感觉奇怪。不对劲的感觉是因为东马的城市都是沿着河边建立所以他们喜欢叫River side city ; 心里感觉奇怪是因为时代广场这个名词是舶来品并来自美国。东马一路来标榜自己和西马不一样怎么也和吉隆坡搞出一个时代广场。这的确勾起了我的好奇心当下就决定隔天早上时势必要来走走看看。

让我感觉奇怪的地方。

隔天早上我吃了歌罗面后就在美里市区乱走一通反正又没赶时间而且我也没租车所以就只能靠自己的双腿。我先是去了美里河附近看下当年我吃饭的餐厅是否还在接着我就走向了美里市区的大伯公廟。當我看到了神廟我就注意到昨晚經過的時代廣場就和神廟只相隔一條馬路。我進入神廟參觀一圈後我就走向時代廣場。

白天時的美里時代廣場雖然也有一些店和銀行在營業不過感覺上還是很空旷因為人流不多。另外晚上時可以開燈讓亮閃閃的感覺讓人覺得來到一個海市蜃樓的地方。像這類似的空曠的地方打著外來地方的名字就是後現代主義建築的模式。他們即沒有本土的靈魂也沒有自我的精神，他們唯一擁有的就是集體化叫著同樣的名字。當你來到了他們的地方走了一圈就會有一種似稱相似的感覺可是當你坐下來深思你會好奇地問這個地標真的是代表這個地方還是只是打著“美化”而進行的一項沒靈魂的建築工程。

在美里時代廣場走了一圈後到了差不多午餐時間時我的大學朋友駕車帶我去吃午餐。我自認不是一個固定會去旅遊的傢伙，畢竟有時旅遊假如只是看風景卻不認識那邊的人感覺就很想叫了一盤美食可是自己卻傷風嚐不到味道。哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈

不知下次几时能夠拿假出門走走了😎。 (1744,5/5/23)

面对绿潮，南洋华侨如何应对？？

随着安华公布了新一年不痛不痒的财政预算案后，天公不作美-我的老家柔佛在这时候发生了水灾。希望大家能够在这次水灾平平安安，早日回复一切。老实说我其实对安华政权的看法就是这个政府去年11月成立我觉得一年后这个政权就收山了。在国盟来势汹汹的情况下，华人社会展现了如一往一样的人格分裂。

典型的奴隶思维模式，你假如也是这样想那不需要看我的文章。

在讨论要如何面对这股绿潮前，你需要问下你自己你是要跪下来生活比如相信在马来西亚政坛追求族群平等就是政治自杀，还是要活着像个人要站着生活的。假如你要跪下来那么你可以不用浪费时间阅读这个文章，可以去继续看“新行动党”的文章。

那么在面对绿潮来袭我们要做的事情有两个主要方向，第一个主要方向是个人，第二则是哪些政府政策适合我们推动然后哪些我们要提防。首先讲个人责任，华人作为非穆斯林在面对穆斯林侵蚀我们的权利和空间时我们很多人都表现被动和畏首畏尾。那么下个月开始的斋戒月就是华人个人责任的时候来临了。在这个穆斯林斋戒期间我们华人没必要配合他们斋戒的习惯而且也必要“躲”起来吃饭或喝水。原因很简单我们不是穆斯林所以我们没必要遵守穆斯林法则。假如你是一位家长当你发现你的学校把你的孩子送去厕所或是隔离起来吃饭这就是时候打电话投诉学校，社区，教育部，报社这样的事情最好越弄越大那么我们的基本的吃饭权力才会被尊重。

第二在斋戒月时看到穆斯林同胞没有斋戒我们不干涉他也没必要去询问他为何不斋戒毕竟这是他们的自由。当然你要去称赞他们这样的做法那是你的自由。有时我们会觉得伊斯兰党利用回教法则来呼唤信徒是绑架宗教可是何尝华人经常也不是用回教法则来绑架回教徒。为此培养尊重个人自由，保护个人自由是面对绿潮来袭的重要想法。

第三就是没必要为了讨好马来人而穿上伊斯兰服饰。我觉得随着伊斯兰已经在马来西亚扎根了还几百年所以有时要100%分别什么是单纯马来人衣服，什么是伊斯兰衣服其实也是有一些挑战不过最主要的考量就是某一款衣服是不是适合在马来西亚潮湿的天气。在这样的考量下，对于男性而言大热天戴着宋谷帽(Songkok)基本就是因为宗教原因所以华人没必要带这个具有宗教意识的帽子。至于其他的长袖衣服或是长裤我觉得问题不大毕竟有时马来西亚蚊子的确多。对于女性而言，穆斯林女性有着一款名叫(Burqa)罩袍的服饰这一款衣服就是从眼睛包到脚底基本可以算是一个忍者的服装了。在伊斯兰革命被安华从伊朗带动马来西亚，普遍马来女性都没有戴头巾的习惯，原因就是热。随着伊斯兰运动从伊朗带了进来结果就是穆斯林女性戴着头巾。那么对于这样的局面，华人真正的正确做法也是简单那就是自己不用带假如看到穆斯林男性或女性没有带任何伊斯兰服饰时不用理睬，原因就是这应该是个人自由。可惜在现实生活有时我们会看到华人去攻击马来女性没带头巾，所以华人自己有所也是马来西亚加速伊斯兰化的帮手之一。个人责任到此结束，那么接下来讨论公共政策的责任。

随着东海岸地区的伊斯兰政党州权不断要施加带有伊斯兰意识的政策，我觉得我们华人/非穆斯林是应该要尊重当地公民的选择。个人种的果必然要个人来承担，他们既然选择了某种特定的生活模式我们也只能尊重。那么对于华人/非穆斯林比例比较多的州政府比如槟州在这个时候最需要做的不是强化任何具有伊斯兰意识形态的政策反而应该执行更多具有非伊斯兰化的政策。比如吉打关闭投注站，那么槟州可以考虑多开投注站甚至合法化赌球。槟州也应该考虑派一只官方队伍去新加坡、澳门和香港学习如何经营政府主导的运动博彩好展示“我们和你们的不同”。另外东海岸州属也是艾滋病偏高的地方，在这个时候槟州其实也可以考虑学习新加坡如何合法管理妓院。当然这样“学习新加坡”的做法肯定会大大刺激“大马来人主义者”，不过既然你已经选择了做初一那我选择做十五才是正确的不然我们还要选择跪下来吗？

在联邦政策里我们应该督促政府多多和美国政府合作加速中美脱钩并把中国的订单带来我们的国家。或许你会好奇为何对抗绿潮要和中美脱钩有所关系，其实看回国盟崛起的路线就是因为大量使用了“逗阴”。在这样的背景下马来西亚政府应该配合美国战略打击“逗阴”接着我们应该督促马来西亚政府学习印度那样全面封杀“逗阴”，这样除了能和世界上的两大国家美国和印度交好我们也能打击对方（国盟）的宣传活动。还有一项重要的联邦政策就是划分选区，想要在政治上打击绿潮那么选区划分就应该要以1：30000的数量来进行。在这样的情况下那些十几万人一个大城市的选区就能变成三个选区这就能增加城市力量的国会议员了。不过这样的做法必须要在宣传战上打出这是让国家更加民主，能够更好照顾选民来做解释不然就是一轮敌方以政治阴谋来炮轰我们。

接着可以进行的新联邦政策就是引入想要逃离中共铁拳的中国人来冲淡绿潮来袭，可是这是风险很高的联邦政策。毕竟中国人是活在了三代没道德底线的社会所以他们的狼性肯定是我们这些还有一丝道德的人无法比拟的。另外回顾当年老马在沙巴进行的身份证计划，把菲律宾的回教徒带入沙巴社会结果就是引发一系列的社会问题以及治安问题。这类型政策能够取得暂时的优势可是长远来看对社会管理的成本则会提高不少。那么最后的问题则是，你要跪还是站呢？🤪🤪🤪

是“真婚姻”还是一场社会自我毁灭的开启？

同性婚姻不论在西方世界还是东方世界一直以来都处于争议性不断。或许看回美国在同性婚姻合法化的这几年所发生的事情后我们能够在面对这个课题能够有一个更明确的立场并不会随便摆动。首先我个人看法在面对同性婚姻就是政府绝不承认，可是在个人生活里两个过了21岁的成年人要同居、要干什么事情是他们的事。宗教团体或是政府不能对两个成年人私生活有所干扰。那么在讨论同性婚姻前我们必须了解其背后的政治逻辑那么才能避免陷入一场公权力扩张的危机。

或许你会觉得爱情、婚姻和家庭的背后是没有政治逻辑，这三个东西都是用爱来做支撑，这类型看法我觉得很适合大爱型人们的思维而我不是搞大爱的。在华人社会我们利用“国家”这个词来形容一个政体，而其背后的逻辑则是先有国才有家。不过其实这样的想法主要是为了迎合汉文化圈的帝制思维。

人类社会是先有人》家庭》社区》社会》国家，那么同性婚姻的冒出就意味着它是为了满足人类最原始的欲望接着再以爱情作为宣传来让大家接纳它们。那么我们可以把同性婚姻当作是个人自由的一种表现，既然这是一个个人自由的表现那么就不需要以政府这个集体社会的逻辑来承认它们。其中一个原因就是同性婚姻是没有生育率的，他们无法诞下新生代。国家的基础就是公民，没了公民就没了国家。或许一些人会提出同性家庭可以通过借精子（女同性家庭）来怀孕并诞下新生代或是领养孤儿（男同性家庭）来照顾新生命,甚至也有男同性家庭去到比较贫困的国家租借贫穷妇女的子宫来怀孕新生命。以上的做法除了形式上看起来很大爱其实也违背了人类几万年来的历史那就是家庭基本都是以血缘来作为羁绊。而且那些有钱的男同性通过自己的经济能力去到贫困地区租用弱势妇女的子宫更加凸显了有钱人对穷人的剥削，这一点都不“大爱”,而且不道德也凸显了传统的沦丧。

既然同性婚姻是以满足个人自由作为前提那么他们的确是可以过他们想过的日子而不需要来打扰我们其他人来承认他们的“私事”,也就是他们的“婚姻”。而且承认他们的“婚姻”也造成了社会管理的成本，比如需要新的立法。在这个立法过程议员要被要求出席讨论、辩论、投票而且这样为了讨好这一小群体的人却浪费了大量的时间请问这真的值得吗？只要个人自由得到保护基本上同性婚姻就不会有问题。相反的则是左派政客通过这个课题加大政府的权力比如在美国发生的政府强制基督教商家必须要和同性恋伴侣制作一个在婚礼时使用的结婚蛋糕。市场自由就在这一刻被政府给破坏，或许以后同性伴侣会用“店家歧视同性恋”来威胁店家给予商品折扣，这就是暴民政治的开端。

从一开始的要求被接受到现在的要逼小孩子看变性人表演

左派团体通过“大爱精神”来要求其他人来遵守他们破坏传统的活动。其背后的主要目的就是把家庭给瓦解，因为在推动大政府这条道路上家庭是他们最后的阻碍。那么要破坏家庭首先就要模糊父亲和母亲的责任，随着同性婚姻的合法化那么父亲这个男性化的角色也就能被女人扮演（在女同性恋家庭）,同样的母亲这个女性化角色也能被男人扮演（在男同性恋家庭）。或许有些会人说同性家庭能够给予下一代和传统家庭一样的爱，这样的说法未必站得住脚。在现实世界里，一个男生在成长的过程假如缺乏一个真实男性作为其生活模式的样板（爸爸）那么他陷入酒精、毒品、暴力的问题可能性往往会高于那些在传统家庭成长的男生。

基督教世界的坍塌其实加速了西方家庭的消灭，现在人们一提起天主教就会让人想起天主教里面所发生的虐待儿童事件。现实世界里的宗教团体的式微其实也和左派政策有所关系。左派政策就是搞福利、加大教育投资、胡乱加税、简单就是把爱/钱撒出去。由国家推动的福利政策把原本属于宗教团体的救济工作给抢走了，在这样的情况下宗教团体的工作量变少而那些希望通过参与救济活动来了解社会的潜在信徒就被政府给赶走了。除了用福利政策来侵蚀宗教的力量，左派政府也不断通过加大公立学校投资来破坏宗教界栽培学生的力量。西方世界著名的大学都是由教会学校开始然后才慢慢转化的。在剥夺了宗教界在世间的力量的同时也破坏了家庭的自然盟友毕竟一个没有宗教力量的家庭往往也是最容易被左派破坏的家庭。

最后，我还是站稳自己的立场那就是政府没必要去干涉两个成年人世界，同时这些少数人也没必要要求我们必须接受你们的看法。

The rise of new Democratic Empire of china

If my memory is not a mistake, I started my social media addiction from 2006. At first it would be Friendster and Hi5 then Facebook, and I also opened an account at Twitter since it appeared . However at that moment I didn't really enjoy Twitter mainly because at that time it didn't have the feature of messenger. From that period of time until now I never opened my Twitter account again.

In 2016, Trump became the President of the USA, unlike the previous POTUS he became the first POTUS actively engaged in sending Tweets. Undoubtedly, every time he sends a Tweet someone or some group will melt down. However during that period of time, Twitter has always been accused of shadow banning conservative figures which means Twitter limits the possibility of people to Tweet which are written by those conservative figures. However if you are a terrorist group you are still allowed to survive at the platform even though you are promoting real violence.

In order to run away from censorship, multiple new websites have been set up. Now I can give a list of alternative social network sites such as GAB, MEWE, MINDS, GETTR, TRUTH SOCIAL, RUMBLE. All these websites believe in the first amendment which is freedom of speech. I consider myself as a believer in freedom of speech therefore I also open an account at these alternative websites. However after a few months of using GETTR I spotted some weird things happening on this website. 

I know GETTR is based in the USA, therefore I don't really expect to see Asian faces on the website. However I encountered quite a lot Asia face account in the website but strangely most of them got one common thing - they all use a background which written NEW FEDERAL STATE OF CHINA REPLACE CURRENT CCP. Then all these accounts also idolise Guo Wengui as their Saviour.

First of all I would emphasise that I am not CCP fans but I am also not interested in supporting an organisation called NEW FEDERAL STATE OF CHINA. The reason is simple: if we want peace in this world then a big CHINA ideology would crush our peace. A disintegrated CHINA would be a peaceful country towards the region and the world. Looking back CHINA history under CCP we clearly see big CHINA ideology tend to create tension in the region the best example would be in recent months CHINA send their fighting jet to disturb TAIWAN airspace. 

The born of new hoax??

Maybe someone will argue that CHINA now is ruled by a one party system therefore they are more barbarian compared to democratic countries. If CHINA became a democratic and capitalist country then they would no longer pose a threat to Taiwan or to the region. I would say this idea is silly and clearly indicates a naive understanding of CHINA contemporary culture and history. In CHINA history we would see she belongs to a land power country which means they focus more on territory gaining. However, this kind of thirst for land exploitation only happens when the CHINA faces a polite neighbour country such as Taiwan, Japan, Philippines and other Southeast Asian countries. While the CHINA faced Russia, the CHINA lost all their ball on defending its own soil. 

Moreover we also had to realise that democracy sometimes means the tyranny of the masses, therefore if CHINA really becomes a democratic country we also can predict that they will have some politician to incite nationalism from the public to support the course on seizing land or islands from its polite neighbour country. Now we should ask quite a few SERIOUS question to those group which call themselves as NEW FEDERAL STATE OF CHINA, I think three question should be enough, 

1. The rights to bear arms in the NEW CHINA

2. Small government or big government in the NEW CHINA

3. Freedom of speech in the NEW CHINA

Let's say we talk with 10k fans of the NEW FEDERAL STATE OF CHINA in GETTR, then based on my understanding of CHINA and ASIA culture, on the first question I doubt how many would allow citizens of NEW CHINA to own firearms ?? I guess less than half will agree that the citizen on the NEW CHINA had the right to bear arms. 

Then at the second question, I also believe that most of those fans of the NEW FEDERAL STATE OF CHINA will say we would build a clean and less corrupt central government. They would not support the idea of small government because they often trap in a mind set which government should actively reach out to the people. However this kind of mentality is the main reason why the government is growing at a fast speed and becoming a corrupt monster which demands more power and sucks the wealth of people. 

Finally, at the last question, I also have a pathetic view on this issue on freedom of speech. From the past until now, CHINA history always full with the story about people been kill or buried alive just because they say something which make the Emperor / King / President not happy. Therefore, I also doubt how many of the fans of the NEW FEDERAL STATE OF CHINA would support freedom of speech once they really hold the power of government. 

WE need different platform to receive information

After two years of life on the constant lies on the virus or the vaccine I believe that we need alternative social network sites to prevent misinformation. However we also need to be careful of the new enemy which uses the new platform to hide their real intention.