Sunday, 5 February 2023

是“真婚姻”还是一场社会自我毁灭的开启?

同性婚姻不论在西方世界还是东方世界一直以来都处于争议性不断。或许看回美国在同性婚姻合法化的这几年所发生的事情后我们能够在面对这个课题能够有一个更明确的立场并不会随便摆动。首先我个人看法在面对同性婚姻就是政府绝不承认,可是在个人生活里两个过了21岁的成年人要同居、要干什么事情是他们的事。宗教团体或是政府不能对两个成年人私生活有所干扰。那么在讨论同性婚姻前我们必须了解其背后的政治逻辑那么才能避免陷入一场公权力扩张的危机。



或许你会觉得爱情、婚姻和家庭的背后是没有政治逻辑,这三个东西都是用爱来做支撑,这类型看法我觉得很适合大爱型人们的思维而我不是搞大爱的。在华人社会我们利用“国家”这个词来形容一个政体,而其背后的逻辑则是先有国才有家。不过其实这样的想法主要是为了迎合汉文化圈的帝制思维。




人类社会是先有人》家庭》社区》社会》国家,那么同性婚姻的冒出就意味着它是为了满足人类最原始的欲望接着再以爱情作为宣传来让大家接纳它们。那么我们可以把同性婚姻当作是个人自由的一种表现,既然这是一个个人自由的表现那么就不需要以政府这个集体社会的逻辑来承认它们。其中一个原因就是同性婚姻是没有生育率的,他们无法诞下新生代。国家的基础就是公民,没了公民就没了国家。或许一些人会提出同性家庭可以通过借精子(女同性家庭)来怀孕并诞下新生代或是领养孤儿(男同性家庭)来照顾新生命,甚至也有男同性家庭去到比较贫困的国家租借贫穷妇女的子宫来怀孕新生命。以上的做法除了形式上看起来很大爱其实也违背了人类几万年来的历史那就是家庭基本都是以血缘来作为羁绊。而且那些有钱的男同性通过自己的经济能力去到贫困地区租用弱势妇女的子宫更加凸显了有钱人对穷人的剥削,这一点都不“大爱”,而且不道德也凸显了传统的沦丧。





既然同性婚姻是以满足个人自由作为前提那么他们的确是可以过他们想过的日子而不需要来打扰我们其他人来承认他们的“私事”,也就是他们的“婚姻”。而且承认他们的“婚姻”也造成了社会管理的成本,比如需要新的立法。在这个立法过程议员要被要求出席讨论、辩论、投票而且这样为了讨好这一小群体的人却浪费了大量的时间请问这真的值得吗?只要个人自由得到保护基本上同性婚姻就不会有问题。相反的则是左派政客通过这个课题加大政府的权力比如在美国发生的政府强制基督教商家必须要和同性恋伴侣制作一个在婚礼时使用的结婚蛋糕。市场自由就在这一刻被政府给破坏,或许以后同性伴侣会用“店家歧视同性恋”来威胁店家给予商品折扣,这就是暴民政治的开端。


从一开始的要求被接受到现在的要逼小孩子看变性人表演






左派团体通过“大爱精神”来要求其他人来遵守他们破坏传统的活动。其背后的主要目的就是把家庭给瓦解,因为在推动大政府这条道路上家庭是他们最后的阻碍。那么要破坏家庭首先就要模糊父亲和母亲的责任,随着同性婚姻的合法化那么父亲这个男性化的角色也就能被女人扮演(在女同性恋家庭),同样的母亲这个女性化角色也能被男人扮演(在男同性恋家庭)。或许有些会人说同性家庭能够给予下一代和传统家庭一样的爱,这样的说法未必站得住脚。在现实世界里,一个男生在成长的过程假如缺乏一个真实男性作为其生活模式的样板(爸爸)那么他陷入酒精、毒品、暴力的问题可能性往往会高于那些在传统家庭成长的男生。




基督教世界的坍塌其实加速了西方家庭的消灭,现在人们一提起天主教就会让人想起天主教里面所发生的虐待儿童事件。现实世界里的宗教团体的式微其实也和左派政策有所关系。左派政策就是搞福利、加大教育投资、胡乱加税、简单就是把爱/钱撒出去。由国家推动的福利政策把原本属于宗教团体的救济工作给抢走了,在这样的情况下宗教团体的工作量变少而那些希望通过参与救济活动来了解社会的潜在信徒就被政府给赶走了。除了用福利政策来侵蚀宗教的力量,左派政府也不断通过加大公立学校投资来破坏宗教界栽培学生的力量。西方世界著名的大学都是由教会学校开始然后才慢慢转化的。在剥夺了宗教界在世间的力量的同时也破坏了家庭的自然盟友毕竟一个没有宗教力量的家庭往往也是最容易被左派破坏的家庭。




最后,我还是站稳自己的立场那就是政府没必要去干涉两个成年人世界,同时这些少数人也没必要要求我们必须接受你们的看法。


Thursday, 26 January 2023

The rise of new Democratic Empire of china

If my memory is not a mistake, I started my social media addiction from 2006. At first it would be Friendster and Hi5 then Facebook, and I also opened an account at Twitter since it appeared . However at that moment I didn't really enjoy Twitter mainly because at that time it didn't have the feature of messenger. From that period of time until now I never opened my Twitter account again.




In 2016, Trump became the President of the USA, unlike the previous POTUS he became the first POTUS actively engaged in sending Tweets. Undoubtedly, every time he sends a Tweet someone or some group will melt down. However during that period of time, Twitter has always been accused of shadow banning conservative figures which means Twitter limits the possibility of people to Tweet which are written by those conservative figures. However if you are a terrorist group you are still allowed to survive at the platform even though you are promoting real violence.




In order to run away from censorship, multiple new websites have been set up. Now I can give a list of alternative social network sites such as GAB, MEWE, MINDS, GETTR, TRUTH SOCIAL, RUMBLE. All these websites believe in the first amendment which is freedom of speech. I consider myself as a believer in freedom of speech therefore I also open an account at these alternative websites. However after a few months of using GETTR I spotted some weird things happening on this website. 




I know GETTR is based in the USA, therefore I don't really expect to see Asian faces on the website. However I encountered quite a lot Asia face account in the website but strangely most of them got one common thing - they all use a background which written NEW FEDERAL STATE OF CHINA REPLACE CURRENT CCP. Then all these accounts also idolise Guo Wengui as their Saviour.




First of all I would emphasise that I am not CCP fans but I am also not interested in supporting an organisation called NEW FEDERAL STATE OF CHINA. The reason is simple: if we want peace in this world then a big CHINA ideology would crush our peace. A disintegrated CHINA would be a peaceful country towards the region and the world. Looking back CHINA history under CCP we clearly see big CHINA ideology tend to create tension in the region the best example would be in recent months CHINA send their fighting jet to disturb TAIWAN airspace. 


The born of new hoax??



Maybe someone will argue that CHINA now is ruled by a one party system therefore they are more barbarian compared to democratic countries. If CHINA became a democratic and capitalist country then they would no longer pose a threat to Taiwan or to the region. I would say this idea is silly and clearly indicates a naive understanding of CHINA contemporary culture and history. In CHINA history we would see she belongs to a land power country which means they focus more on territory gaining. However, this kind of thirst for land exploitation only happens when the CHINA faces a polite neighbour country such as Taiwan, Japan, Philippines and other Southeast Asian countries. While the CHINA faced Russia, the CHINA lost all their ball on defending its own soil. 





Moreover we also had to realise that democracy sometimes means the tyranny of the masses, therefore if CHINA really becomes a democratic country we also can predict that they will have some politician to incite nationalism from the public to support the course on seizing land or islands from its polite neighbour country. Now we should ask quite a few SERIOUS question to those group which call themselves as NEW FEDERAL STATE OF CHINA, I think three question should be enough, 



  1. The rights to bear arms in the NEW CHINA

  2. Small government or big government in the NEW CHINA

  3. Freedom of speech in the NEW CHINA




Let's say we talk with 10k fans of the NEW FEDERAL STATE OF CHINA in GETTR, then based on my understanding of CHINA and ASIA culture, on the first question I doubt how many would allow citizens of NEW CHINA to own firearms ?? I guess less than half will agree that the citizen on the NEW CHINA had the right to bear arms. 




Then at the second question, I also believe that most of those fans of the NEW FEDERAL STATE OF CHINA will say we would build a clean and less corrupt central government. They would not support the idea of small government because they often trap in a mind set which government should actively reach out to the people. However this kind of mentality is the main reason why the government is growing at a fast speed and becoming a corrupt monster which demands more power and sucks the wealth of people. 




Finally, at the last question, I also have a pathetic view on this issue on freedom of speech. From the past until now, CHINA history always full with the story about people been kill or buried alive just because they say something which make the Emperor / King / President not happy. Therefore, I also doubt how many of the fans of the NEW FEDERAL STATE OF CHINA would support freedom of speech once they really hold the power of government. 


WE need different platform to receive information



After two years of life on the constant lies on the virus or the vaccine I believe that we need alternative social network sites to prevent misinformation. However we also need to be careful of the new enemy which uses the new platform to hide their real intention.