Saturday, 13 April 2024

随心而寫-离地选民看世界之马来西亚篇 壹

 最近马来西亚社会被一轮接着一轮的宗教课题占据了个大新闻头条。这样的情况也让不少人对回教极端化感到不满可是却又感觉无能为力。非穆斯林社区在面对穆斯林打出对某商业活动的杯葛行动时除了无力的嘲笑/嘲讽/讥讽穆斯林对经济的无知其实也没太多动作原因就在于非穆斯林社区尤其是华人社区已经大步前进原子化社会。



何谓原子化社会,为何我又会把华人社区归类为原子化社会?在科学角度里,一个固体就是不同的原子拥挤成一个物体。原子化社会的重大倾向就是喜欢讨论虚拟看不到的大菊观、国家战略和一些所谓的进步价值观的东西。华人社会把英文字State翻译成国家这个动作就意味着华人容易成为国家社会主义的牺牲品。华人每天嚷嚷上口的先有国才有家更加是反人类的认知,一个社会的建立模式就是,两个人(必须是一男一女)组织家庭,不同的家庭组织成部落,不同的部落组织成社会,不同的社会再组织成一个国家。对于一个社区和社会而言最重要的就是持续的有新生命的诞生,可是当一个社区每天把时间花在讨论遥远的大菊观,自身的社区人口凋零时还把支持自我毁灭的同性结婚带入华人社区里那么华人社区的原子化势必会更加严重。




那么华人社区又该如何面对宗教极端化呢?老实说每个马来西亚的华人都基本要对目前的宗教极端化负上一定的责任。首先我们说说个人的责任,请问当你在读书时期假如遇到马来人没节食你会不会嘲笑对方不是一个合格的穆斯林?或者是马来人节食时你的春袋不见了看到他们节食结果自己要跑去厕所吃东西或是喝水。假如你曾经做过这样的事情基本上可以算是你为了穆斯林更加穆斯林化出了一份力。那么现在为了阻挡宗教极端化,我们的工作就是很简单,做好自己就好。当你看到穆斯林不要节食不要去管那么多,而当穆斯林节食时你照样吃你的食物和喝你的水。那么对于那些在其生活都只接触华人居多的“奇型种华人”也就是小学读华小,中学读独中,大学去中港澳台留学从来没有任何的穆斯林朋友的华人。他们为马来西亚社会宗教极端化的贡献则是最特别因为他们要威又要带頭盔-他们不要跟随主流教育系统可是却又要政府接受他们的文凭。既然华人教育是打着阻止政府消灭华语教育却一方面恳求政府承认他们的文凭这不等于是自相矛盾吗?面對大馬來人主義時他們選擇站了出來進行對抗並在馬來人社區裡贏了尊重可是不久後又跪下來要求政府機構給予工作因為它們要吃皇糧,這樣翻來翻去,你覺得他們會如何看你呢?




而且大中华主义者也利用马来西亚教育界的松散也就是利用獨中的制度把他们病态的价值观输入马来西亚。最變態的中華主義世界觀就是每天告訴大家落後挨人打是活該,可是中國自己落後時被人打就是對方的錯誤。好一個雙標而且還是臉不紅,嘴不喘。要對抗宗教極端化最好的方法就是輸出自由拒絕大一統。既然馬來西亞憲法給了獨中繼續存在的可能,那麼這個系統誕生出來的人要更加支持自由並和非中文世界建立聯繫。




在討論了華人作為個體的行動後我們接著討論華人作為群體的行動。華人作為單獨個體的確是很強不過作為一個群體卻是經常犯錯的。最佳例子就是相信共產黨而且更加可怕的是這類型動作還在進行中。為了不讓極端宗教進入公民的整體生活裏,最重要的工作就是把宗教局從一個在全部州屬都有辦公室的聯邦機構縮減成一個只有在吉隆坡有辦公室的聯邦部門。馬來西亞宗教局對馬來西亞公民的控制力是無與倫比的,一個記者會就可以讓幾萬家庭的假期被延遲,同樣一個記者會可以讓人發達也可以讓人倒楣。現在是時候讓馬來西亞回歸穆斯林多元化的時代也就是讓自身州屬的蘇丹來決定何時是他們自己的宗教節日。這樣的政策就會誕生出無法一個記者會就能煽動全國穆斯林的情況畢竟強人政治的溫床就是中央集權,我們是聯邦制度所以大家管理自己才是上策而不是每天期待一個中央強人來管理我們。通常中央強人出現時往往都是弊端不斷,哪怕早期展示出多好的氣勢。值得一題的就是馬來西亞宗教局就是馬哈迪成立的,現在還有多少人覺得騎馬殺雞是各好事呢?哈哈




马来西亚华人的祖先当年逃离了中华帝国来到了南洋躲在大英帝国的法制社会下和穆斯林社区生活在一起。或许我们华人无法完全学习到英国人普通法的精髓不过照顾好个人自由,保护家庭,保护社区才是我们最重要的事情。南洋华人可以在一个安全距离内观察共产社会对中国的破坏也可以观察到大中华主义者对台湾的破坏。对于任何提倡“进步价值观”的个体或是政党我们必须提起全面精神因为他们的本质是破坏、毁灭和嗜血。以下截图就是最佳例子为何要提防进步价值观。






看起来在一些人眼里所谓的进步就是先摧毁曾经拥有的一切才能进步,这不就是文革吗?只不过这次的文革开始时是讲着英文的。(0640, 14/4/2024)


Tuesday, 20 June 2023

The total BULLSHIT about left and wing collaboration government



Coalition government - a term which keep popping out during Malaysian and some citizens from the European Union daily activity. After reading the Cameroon biography my thoughts on any coalition government between right and left become more despised. Maybe we can compare both UK and Malaysia coalition government and see what the similarities and disparities is. 

 

There are three important aspects when we want to discuss conservatism. These aspects are personal freedom, community traditions and the role of government. During Cameroon period, the major erosion on personal freedom were GAY MARRIAGE. Most people believe that GAY MARRIAGE is a sign of support personal freedom, then government should legalize it. The first part of the above statement is true but the part about the government was terribly wrong. Allowing the hand of government to enter personal freedom actually is a sign of government expansion. Why should the state hold the power to recognize the people's lifestyle? Left wing politicians like to say "let people live their life" but ended up with the government enforcing the law to "recognize" people's personal life. What an irony. 

 


Second will be community traditions, for hundreds of years British are built up under the influence of Christianity. Therefore, marriage means a sacred union between a man and a woman. However, under the attack from Marxist warrior, now British are starting to dismantle this sacred union, and Cameroon push for GAY MARRIAGE should let us consider he should not be a self-proclaimed conservative figure. GAY MARRIAGE should be considered as ultimate personal freedom therefore state should not involve. In the meantime, the GAY MARRIAGE also should not be allowed to adopt any children, because this will deprive the children of having a real mother. Below are the link that he support such action to destroy the family:

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/david-cameron-on-the-first-uk-same-sex-marriages 

 

A trojan horse in UK?

 Thirdly would be the role of government. Conservatives believe in small government but based on what Cameroon biography says I feel he doesn't look like a person who believes in this value. He says he believes in “BIG SOCIETY”, but I sense this as a trick to cover the intention that his real motive is trying to make the government become bigger and bigger. No doubt the best way to expand the government role would be to increase social welfare and most of the time social welfare consumes more money and energy when compared to defense spending.

 

Most importantly, state social welfare more often brings harm to people. The reason was obvious and simple because people misuse the system. In the past decade we often can see some UK local newspapers reporting Muslim Migrants sucking on the UK welfare system. They come to the UK with a huge family but refuse to work and ask for free cash, a free house and free food. Those situations have not stopped and have continued to happen until now. No doubt a collaboration government between left and right showcase how the right lose their value.

 

 

 Then, lets us look at Malaysia. In Malaysia we don’t have any political party which advocate on small government and support on personal freedom. I think 99% of political party in Malaysia are favor on big federal government. Then in Malaysia when we hear about conservative that mean protect Malay Special Right, enhance federal power to enforce Malay superiority doctrine. The former prime minister tries to reduce the sense of race class, so he introduces the idea of T20, M40 and B40. However, he loses the General Election in 2018 and now serve his sentence on corruption case. Then during 2018, Dr Mahathir decided to cooperate which he enemy DAP which shock the Malaysian and mark the starting of losing its value on both sides.

 


DAP is supporting on Malaysian for Malaysia, but Dr Mahathir represent the uphold on Malay Special Right. Since the cooperate announce DAP quickly abandon their value and never intended to challenge the Malay Special Right. However, this collaboration only last two years then it collapses. During the period of 2018 until 2020, I think the major winner would be the Malay conservative because they managed to castrate their major enemy in Malaysia politic realm. Before became a part of federal government DAP did advocate on reduce on government size which mean reduce the staff which employ by the federal government or closing some unnecessary department but when their become the members in the federal government, they also throw this idea from the bus.

 

 


Then if you ask me what does UMNO, and other Malay parties lose when their form a collaboration with a political party which never uphold Malay Special Rights. I think the only possible answer should be they will bombard by some Muslim voters?


Maybe we the non-Muslim are the biggest loser during the period from 2018 until now? (1200, 21/6/2023)