Tuesday, 18 April 2017

How Islam use the idea of Special Right to attract young people in the Europe.



                In the past week, I come across an article which written by a Hong Kong journalist. This article is an introduction of a book which written by a Japanese journalist, the focus on the book is the expansion of terrorism in the Europe.  One of the idea in the book attract my attention, the author believe that the lack of energetic grain cause many youngster join the extremer Islamist
However, I found this idea are quite inconceivable. I believe that are others idea in the Islam that attract the people in the Europe to ISIL. By compare the norm and social idea of the Western Europe and the idea in Islam, we will know what happen now in the youngster mind. 

The view from Japan journalist towards Islamization of Europe


From the early England revolution until 18th century French Revolution,the Europe society especially Western Europe had achieved a great amount of social progress.The ideals of the French Revolution were based on the "Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity. As time pass on,these value already deep inside the Western Europe. The equal treatment to every person already become a norm in Europe society.In the contrast, Islam are now pumping the idea of special right into the Europe society.

Western Europe social value


Young community never go through the harsh days are attracted by these special right。Every religion system always will tell they followers which they are the chosen one, they are the special one.Buddhist they don write this in their holy book, christian in the past got all this theory, but after the new testament come out the situation become different. Now Islam use a systematic way to show to their believers they are having special right.

Muslim special right, can avoid been criticize by anyone.




















Hijab is just a cloth or that symbol others?


First, is clothing. Female Muslim are required to wear hijab or so call tudung in southeast country。In Europe society, people believe that religion and government are two separate thing.When the Muslim come to Western Europe they say they want to wear hijab especially in the public sector such as police, army, nurse. However, in the real life you should never bring u religion to the workplace, this a norm to those work in Western Europe. That why we never see nurse and police wear the cross which symbol christian when they perform duty. In Muslim view, they always say wear hijab is their personal view and not religion inside. This is bullshit, Muslim learn to wear hijab are from their religion teaching. Western Europe don have the desert which are so hot and need them to wear something to cover and protect them from the sun and sand.  Muslim wear hijab reason is simple because they are trying to tell the others they are different and can break the norm.



After clothing, then come with the food. Muslim always ask for halal food, but they forget that finding halal food should be their own responsible. Today Muslim ask for halal food, next days, Christian ask for Christian food then next day maybe Hindu ask for a Hindu food. This can become a new social problem because everyone got a different view of how the food to be produce. Muslim tell people to respect their right to eat Halal food, but in the real right will Muslim respect the right of non-Muslim to consume non-halal food? For example, if a gang which have 20 person want to go and take a dinner and that is only one Muslim inside, the Muslim will say please follow with me to eat Halal food because this is minority right. In contrast, if a gang which have 20 person want to go dinner and that is only one non-Muslim inside, do you think the rest 19 person Muslim will follow and go for non-Halal food? Will that be minority right for those non-Muslim when they encounter majority of Muslim?


After food then come with social value, when talking about social value in Islam perspective with Western Europe that will be a huge different. Woman right topic always a huge dispute between the Muslim with the Western Europe. In middle east and Africa, woman are treat badly in Muslim society. They cannot go to work, denied for education, cannot drive. The most disturbing social practice of the Muslim will by the Female Genital Mutilation. The purpose of this practice is against human nature, it intends to denied the woman to have sexual desire. Unfortunately, the Feminism are more interesting on criticizing Donald Trump rather than fighting for Female Muslim right. Maybe because they afraid to be label as Islamphobia so they don want to criticizing what the unhuman practice by the Muslim? 

Inhuman practice- Female Genital Mutilation













The idea of special right of Muslim also come to law section. The mass immigrant of Muslim to the Western Europe are create a opportunity to the Muslim to justify themselves have the right to implement the Sharia law. The main objective of Sharia Law is to kill the freedom to speech and the freedom of religion. Muslim in the Western Europe cry for religion freedom to practice they faith, but when a Muslim want to become atheists or convert to others religion. Muslim will try to hurt them or kill them. Religion freedom mean everyone have the right to convert to other religion or don need to have religion. Some Muslim simply don understand this universe principle,  and now they will use the Sharia Law to shut down the people opportunity to exit from Islam. Under the name of Sharia Law, we saw plenty of failed state. So, the Muslim intention to promote the Sharia Law are because they want to make the Western Europe become one of the member in the list of failed state?

That are some conspiracy theory suggest that the Jews are using economic power to dominated the world; the other one conspiracy will be the Muslim are using population to dominated the world.
So now imagine you are living in Western Europe, you will think that which conspiracy theory are real and happen right under you nose? 

Will this happen?



Monday, 28 November 2016

单一种族团体/社团/政党真的是右派吗?何谓右派?

    在马来西亚,你只要翻开报纸看到任何有关马来人民族团体/社团/政党的新闻时,只要有人发表一些极端的言论。这些人团体/社团/政党就会被标榜为右派政党,不过这真的是右派的价值观吗?我对把单一种族单团体/社团/政党标榜为右派,其实是对右派的一种侮辱。除了平面媒体,一些网络媒体也学习了平面媒体的劣习,直接就把单一种族的团体标榜为右派。不过,媒体自己也有一些自相矛盾,假如一个马来人政党是吹捧多元主义,媒体就不会把他们列入右派。哪怕这个马来人政党,嘴巴上讲要多元化,可是身体上却是反对非马来人加入其政党。


前几年最出名的马来人右派团体,不过,这条水真的知道什么是右派吗?












老马告诉你他支持多元文化,可是他的政党只允许马来人加入,你对他还有希望?呵呵












     那么“真右派”的价值观又是如何?右派自身又是如何观察自身的民族优越感呢?真所谓君子爱财,取之有道,我们就先来讨论右派的经济观点。右派相信自由的市场经济,并且相信市场有能力进行自我调整并且淘汰掉不良的企业。右派也反对庞大的国营企业,并认为那是摧毁人民自身的创造能力。国营企业太过大,也就意味着容易出现资源管理不当,滥权,舞弊等现象。那么,我们来看看马来西亚那些所谓的马来人右派政党是否有这样的想法呢?答案,你也知道。只要是国营企业一出现经营不当的现象,政府就马上打开国库来拯救。假如是按照右派的想法,国营企业假如出现经营不当就务必让他自身倒闭并进行新一轮的重组。

国营企业=铁饭碗?













刚讲了经济那么就来讲社会,右派不相信福利社会。原因就是人都是懒惰的,任何有不劳而获的事件都会让人民缺乏进取心,也就是越变越懒惰。而且右派鼓励竞争,良性竞争可以鼓励企业和人民变得更好。回到马来西亚,每当马来人“右翼”上街示威时,他们的诉求是什么呢?他们的诉求完全和真正的右翼相反,那些诉求基本上就是维护马来人特权,要求政府派多些钱,维持庞大的官僚体系。右派鼓励竞争所以不相信特权,因为特权会让一个人变得懒惰并且不上进。这几年来离开马来西亚的非马来人越来越多,原因非常简单,为何需要去换税来维持另一个族群的特权呢?在308和505时,那么多人回来投票而且投票率之高也是独立以来最高的,原因就是大家希望终结马来人特权。不过,当你看着这八年来反对党已经开始变得维护马来人特权时,你还会支持他们吗?

福利社会是照顾全部人还是只照顾马来人?











    在马来西亚我们经常会看到政府系统化的抹黑左派人士,逮捕左派人士进行一些反民主的事情。在这样的情况下,一些人士就喜欢把贪污腐败扣在右派的头上。不过,右派真的是一个国家贪污腐败的罪人吗?答案当然不是,胡乱把贪污腐败扣在右派的头上只是一些政治抹黑手腕。在欧美,一些倾左的平面媒体和网络媒体喜欢攻击右派政治人物为“反移民人士”或是“反回教”。左派对待难民的态度和右派是当然是不一样的,欧美左派认为难民国家的失败是因为欧美早期的帝国主义所造成的,所以这些左派积极吹捧收留难民政策并认为这是一项伟大人道任务。右派却不这样认为,右派认为亚非拉国家的失败是因为自身国家的制度本身就具有巨大问题,才会诞生这么多失败的国家出现。而且,右派坚定的认为移民必须是依照合法的途径移民才可以被接纳,那些非法移民必须被遣送回国。而且右派也不相信所谓的历史负担,欧美右派认为帝国主义已经走入了棺材所以一个国家的管理失败应该是自身的失败而不是其他国家的责任。

在21世纪,让帝国主义背黑锅还是蛮有市场的








叙利亚的内战打了差不多两年,胜利者还是没有出现。大量的难民利用这个机会四处逃离,有些逃到欧洲有些则来到了我国。这些难民会否融入我国社会我觉得还有待观察,不过这一批难民的数量并不是很多我觉得应该不会对我们的社会进行太大冲击。我是很好奇,这些难民到底是逊尼派回教徒还是什叶派回教徒呢?在马来西亚,穆斯林多数都是逊尼派的,那些少数的什叶派常年被政府官员骚扰。而且,也有不少逊尼派的宗教师老爱抨击什叶派为邪教,在这样的情况下,又有哪个政党敢为这些少数人士发声呢?我看不论是主流媒体还是网络媒体,都没人敢为这些处于社会边缘的人士发声。毕竟讨好占了多数的逊尼派马来人才是大家的工作呢,哪怕最后摧毁我们的国家。


讨好马来人很重要












随便把任何单一种族团体/社团/政党标榜为右派简直就是媒体界的自身堕落,这也证明媒体自身没对政治形态做足一定的研究。除此之外,最让人啼笑皆非的就是西方世界的大媒体到东方世界的大媒体都在散播一股对右派新的攻击,那就是极右派会诞生出类似像德国纳粹那样的政党。不论未来的世界是如何,人们应该注意和需要保护才是“言论自由”,而不是浪费时间去担心什么极右或是极左的诞生。当人们生活在一个拥有言论自由的社会,人们自然就会去阻止一些反人类的行为。德国纳粹的诞生基本上也是因为言论自由的消失,回顾当时的历史你就会知道,纳粹之所以在德国会那么猛,当时的反对党也有一定的责任。敬请期待我的下一篇文章,哈哈哈。

言论自由才是最重要